Figure S.4.4     Contested Reichstag Elections, Saxony and the Reich, 1871–1918

 

 

Constitu-

Contested

Contested

encies

Elections

Rate

Territory

(no.)

(no.)

(%)

1871

1874

1877

1878

1881

1884

1887

1890

1893

1898

1903

1907

1912

Saxony (contested)

23

60

20.1

2

3

5

2

7

9

5

7

7

5

4

2

2

Saxony (annulled)

7

0

0

0

0

2

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

Prussia

236

688

22.4

Bavaria

48

57

9.1

Württemberg

17

15

6.8

Baden

14

19

10.4

Hessen

9

16

13.7

Mecklenburgs

7

21

23.1

1871

1874

1877

1878

1881

1884

1887

1890

1893

1898

1903

1907

1912

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reich (contested)

397

974

56

47

54

74

59

81

67

81

114

93

87

87

74

Reich (annulled)

89

7

2

5

7

10

2

3

4

20

7

9

1

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1881: National Liberal Leuschner in 17: Glauchau-Meerane and Progressive Kutschbach in 20: Marienburg.

 

1884: Conservative Ebert resigned in 19: Stollberg before formal annulment.

 

1890: Conservative Kurtz resigned in 22: Auerbach before formal annulment.

 

1893: Conservative von Polenz in 23: Plauen.

 

1898: [Antisemitic] Reformer Lotze in 8: Pirna.

 

1912: [Free] Conservative Liebert resigned in 14: Borna before formal annulment.

 

 

Source: Compiled from data in Robert Arsenschek, Der Kampf um die Wahlfreiheit im Kaiserreich. Zur parlamentarischen Wahlprüfung und politischen Realität der Reichstagswahlen 1871–1914 (Düsseldorf, 2003), 114f., 160, 181.

 


2000px-Map-DR-Saxony.svg

Copyright © 2017 James Retallack. All rights reserved. This page is part of the Online Supplement to James Retallack, Red Saxony: Election Battles and the Spectre of Democracy in Germany, 1860-1918 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017). ISBN 978-0-19-966878-6. Last updated: 7 March 2022.